Turn the market data into a marketing strategy brief

Assembled from the pages in this section · language deliberately cautiousmodeled

Pick a market, and this assembles the thirteen sections of a marketing strategy brief from the data already on this site, with every figure carrying its source and vintage, every derived score carrying its methodology, and every recommendation written as a hypothesis to be tested against internal data rather than as a conclusion.

Why the language is careful. The brief says "the data suggests", "this market may warrant" and "a planning hypothesis is", and it says so on purpose. Nothing on this site knows your network, your bid, your provider relationships or your service history. A brief that reads more confident than that would be misleading in a document that ends up in front of an executive committee.

Build the brief

Choose a market and select Assemble the brief. Everything is generated in your browser from the data already loaded on this page; nothing is sent anywhere.

The thirteen sections

#SectionWhat it carries
1Executive summaryWhat the data says about this market, in five lines.
2Market size and MA dynamicsMedicare population, MA & other health plan share, headroom and momentum.
3D-SNP opportunityDual population, density, state capture proxy and uncaptured pool.
4Competitive landscapeCarrier structure and concentration where published.
5Product and benefit positionWhat can be said today, and what waits on Landscape and PBP.
6Quality and Stars contextStatus of contract-level Star Ratings on this site.
7Market disruption and exitsWhat is known and what is not.
8Policy and compliance considerationsTracked actions relevant to this plan.
9Audience and geography considerationsAggregate context for channel planning.
10Recommended strategic prioritiesPlanning hypotheses, framed as hypotheses.
11Campaign assumptions and business caseWhatever you entered, carried through.
12Risks and limitationsWhat the data cannot tell you.
13Sources and methodologyEvery file, vintage and derived score used.

Sections whose data is not yet ingested are not omitted. They state what is missing and which CMS file would fill them, so the gap travels with the brief instead of being discovered in the meeting.

So what / Now what Interpretation

The failure mode of a market brief is confident prose over thin data. Structuring it so every section names its source, its vintage and its gaps produces a shorter, more arguable document, and the argument is the useful part. A brief that survives a hostile read is worth more than one that reads well.

What should I do next?

Sources and vintage

DatasetSourceVintageStatus
MA and other health plan enrollment and share by countyCMS Medicare Monthly Enrollment (BENE_GEO_LVL=County)April 2026live
Dual-eligible counts by countyCMS Medicare Monthly Enrollment (DUAL_TOT_BENES / FULL_DUAL_TOT_BENES)April 2026live
SNP enrollment, integration and plansCMS SNP Comprehensive Report (SNP_REPORT_PART_17)August 2026live
Marketing Opportunity ScoreDerived, tools/build_marketing_data.py v0.12026-08-26modeled

Full methodology: Marketing Opportunity Score · site methodology.