What would have to be true for this campaign to pay back?
Every input in this model is one you enter. There is no published CMS file for response rates, conversion rates or cost per lead, so this page does not pretend to have them. What it does is make the arithmetic explicit and show you the break-even points, so a campaign business case can be argued about honestly: the disagreement moves to the assumptions, which is where it belongs.
Assumptions
How the arithmetic works
| Output | Formula |
|---|---|
| Reached | addressable population × reach |
| Responses | reached × response rate |
| Qualified leads | responses × lead rate |
| Modeled enrollments | qualified leads × conversion rate |
| Cost per lead | entered, or budget ÷ qualified leads |
| Modeled CAC | (budget ÷ enrollments) + other acquisition cost per enrollment |
| Break-even conversion | the conversion rate at which CAC equals the member value you entered |
| Break-even CAC | equal to the member value you entered |
No step in this chain uses a number from CMS, because CMS does not publish any of them. The addressable population is the only input this site can supply, and it comes from the county enrollment file.
So what / Now what Interpretation
A campaign business case in this category usually fails on one of two numbers: reach that assumes the whole market is addressable, or a conversion rate carried over from a different product in a different market structure. The sensitivity table is the point of this page. If the plan only works at the optimistic end of both, it is not a plan.
- Run the model at your planning assumption, then run it at half the response rate. If the second run is unfundable, the campaign needs a different shape, not a bigger budget.
- In high-capture D-SNP markets, expect conversion to behave like switching rather than acquisition, and set the assumption accordingly, see the D-SNP view.
- Save the run with the marketing project so the assumption set is attached to the market it was made for.
- Take the same assumptions to finance before the media commitment, not after it.