What would have to be true for this campaign to pay back?

User assumptions · no published response or conversion rates existmodeled

Every input in this model is one you enter. There is no published CMS file for response rates, conversion rates or cost per lead, so this page does not pretend to have them. What it does is make the arithmetic explicit and show you the break-even points, so a campaign business case can be argued about honestly: the disagreement moves to the assumptions, which is where it belongs.

What this is not. It does not model revenue, member lifetime value or margin. Those depend on your bid, your risk profile and your cost structure, none of which are public. If you want a payback figure, enter your own member value and the model will use it, clearly labeled as your number rather than ours.

Assumptions

How the arithmetic works

OutputFormula
Reachedaddressable population × reach
Responsesreached × response rate
Qualified leadsresponses × lead rate
Modeled enrollmentsqualified leads × conversion rate
Cost per leadentered, or budget ÷ qualified leads
Modeled CAC(budget ÷ enrollments) + other acquisition cost per enrollment
Break-even conversionthe conversion rate at which CAC equals the member value you entered
Break-even CACequal to the member value you entered

No step in this chain uses a number from CMS, because CMS does not publish any of them. The addressable population is the only input this site can supply, and it comes from the county enrollment file.

So what / Now what Interpretation

A campaign business case in this category usually fails on one of two numbers: reach that assumes the whole market is addressable, or a conversion rate carried over from a different product in a different market structure. The sensitivity table is the point of this page. If the plan only works at the optimistic end of both, it is not a plan.

What should I do next?